Supplements

A nomogram integrating HbA1c, sleep quality, social support, and vision-related quality of life predicts depression risk in patients with type 2 diabetic retinopathy

This cross-sectional study of 490 diabetic retinopathy patients found that a nomogram combining four predictors (HbA1c, PSQI score, SSRS score, and VRQoL score) achieved excellent discrimination for depression risk (AUC=0.918 in training, 0.867 in internal validation, 0.875 in temporal validation). The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 29.18%. The nomogram can aid early screening of high-risk individuals.

1 min readUpdated Aug 8, 20260 RCTsView structured evidence →
Evidence Score34/100
Human RCT☆☆☆☆☆
Meta-analysis☆☆☆☆☆
Mechanism★★★★★
Safety★★★★
Confidencelow

This article is automatically generated from the structured evidence profile behind the claim above. Scores reflect the quality and quantity of available research, not clinical advice.

A nomogram integrating HbA1c, sleep quality, social support, and vision-related quality of life predicts depression risk in patients with type 2 diabetic retinopathy The current body of evidence comprises 1 study. EvidenceHub rates the overall confidence at 34/100 (low).

The Claim

A nomogram integrating HbA1c, sleep quality, social support, and vision-related quality of life predicts depression risk in patients with type 2 diabetic retinopathy

This conclusion is most relevant to: Patients with type 2 diabetic retinopathy (n=490, mean age not specified).

What the Research Shows

The conclusion draws on 1 linked study. Highlights from the cited literature:

  • Vision-Focused Nomogram for Assessing the Risk of Depression in Diabetic Retinopathy: Integrating Visual Function, Metabolic Factors and Psychosocial Status. (Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2026) —

How It Works

The proposed biological pathway:

  • Higher HbA1c (OR=1.716) indicates poor glycemic control, which may contribute to depression via metabolic and vascular pathways
  • Higher PSQI score (OR=1.306) reflects poor sleep quality, which is a known risk factor for depression
  • Lower SSRS score (OR=0.883) indicates reduced social support, increasing depression vulnerability
  • Higher VRQoL score (OR=1.138) suggests worse vision-related quality of life, leading to psychological distress and depression

Who Might Benefit

Evidence fit by population:

  • Patients with type 2 diabetic retinopathy (n=490, mean age not specified)

Limitations & Caveats

Important context when interpreting this evidence:

  • Cross-sectional design prevents causal inference
  • Single-center study with internal and temporal validation from the same center, limiting generalizability
  • No external validation from other centers or diverse populations

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the prevalence of depression in diabetic retinopathy patients?

The prevalence was 29.18% (143 out of 490 patients) in this study.

Which factors are most important for predicting depression in diabetic retinopathy?

The four independent predictors are HbA1c, sleep quality (PSQI), social support (SSRS), and vision-related quality of life (VRQoL). SHAP analysis identified VRQoL as the most influential predictor.

How accurate is the nomogram in predicting depression risk?

The nomogram showed excellent discrimination with AUCs of 0.918 in the training cohort, 0.867 in internal validation, and 0.875 in temporal validation.

Can this nomogram be used in clinical practice?

Yes, it is designed as an interpretable tool for early screening of high-risk DR patients, but external validation is needed before widespread use.

References

  1. 1.Tang M, Wang J, Yang Y, Cheng R, Jiang X, Zhu J. “Vision-Focused Nomogram for Assessing the Risk of Depression in Diabetic Retinopathy: Integrating Visual Function, Metabolic Factors and Psychosocial Status..” Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2026. PMID: 42549345 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S610034
Disclaimer: This article is auto-generated from structured research data for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Evidence scores reflect the quality and quantity of available research, not clinical recommendations. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement or intervention.