Supplements

Acute caffeine supplementation improves sprint performance and passing accuracy while reducing rating of perceived exertion in rugby players

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomized placebo-controlled trials found that acute caffeine supplementation in rugby players was associated with small improvements in sprint performance (Hedges' g = -0.41, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.08) and reduced rating of perceived exertion (Hedges' g = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.06). A large positive effect was observed for passing accuracy (Hedges' g = 1.65, 95% CI: 0.69 to 2.61), though with high heterogeneity. No significant effects were found for jumping, strength, or metabolic markers.

1 min readUpdated Jul 28, 20260 RCTs1 Meta-analysesView structured evidence →
Evidence Score49/100
Human RCT☆☆☆☆☆
Meta-analysis★★★☆☆
Mechanism★★★★★
Safety★★★★
Confidencelow

This article is automatically generated from the structured evidence profile behind the claim above. Scores reflect the quality and quantity of available research, not clinical advice.

Acute caffeine supplementation improves sprint performance and passing accuracy while reducing rating of perceived exertion in rugby players The current body of evidence comprises 1 study and 1 meta-analysis. EvidenceHub rates the overall confidence at 49/100 (low).

The Claim

Acute caffeine supplementation improves sprint performance and passing accuracy while reducing rating of perceived exertion in rugby players

This conclusion is most relevant to: Rugby players (various codes and competitive levels).

What the Research Shows

The conclusion draws on 1 linked study. Highlights from the cited literature:

  • Acute caffeine supplementation in rugby players: a systematic review and meta-analysis of physical performance, sport-specific performance, perceptual responses, and physiological markers. (Frontiers in nutrition, 2026) — A systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomized placebo-controlled trials found that acute caffeine supplementation in rugby players was associated with small improvements in sprint performance (Hedges' g = -0.41, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.08) and reduced rating of perceived exertion (Hedges' g = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.06). A large positive effect was observed for passing accuracy (Hedges' g = 1.65, 95% CI: 0.69 to 2.61), though with high heterogeneity. No significant effects were found for jumping, strength, or metabolic markers.

How It Works

The proposed biological pathway:

  • Caffeine blocks adenosine receptors
  • Reduces perception of effort
  • Enhances neuromuscular activation
  • Result: Improved sprint and passing performance

Who Might Benefit

Evidence fit by population:

  • Rugby players (various codes and competitive levels)

Limitations & Caveats

Important context when interpreting this evidence:

  • Certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low
  • High heterogeneity and potential small-study effects for passing accuracy
  • Observational evidence suggests possible sleep and recovery concerns

Frequently Asked Questions

Does caffeine improve sprint performance in rugby players?

Yes, the meta-analysis found a small but significant improvement in sprint performance (Hedges' g = -0.41) with acute caffeine supplementation.

What is the effect of caffeine on passing accuracy in rugby?

A large positive effect was found for passing accuracy (Hedges' g = 1.65), but this finding had high heterogeneity and potential small-study effects, so it should be interpreted cautiously.

Are there any negative effects of caffeine for rugby players?

Observational evidence suggested possible sleep and recovery concerns following caffeine exposure, though this was not the primary focus of the meta-analysis.

What is the recommended dose of caffeine for rugby players?

The review did not identify a specific recommended dose; subgroup analysis found no moderating effect of dose on outcomes.

References

  1. 1.Li J, Zhou D, Wang T, Liu Z, Zeng Z, Yue C, Huang C, Chen W, Shu J, Meng F. “Acute caffeine supplementation in rugby players: a systematic review and meta-analysis of physical performance, sport-specific performance, perceptual responses, and physiological markers..” Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. PMID: 42490897 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1884686
Disclaimer: This article is auto-generated from structured research data for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Evidence scores reflect the quality and quantity of available research, not clinical recommendations. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement or intervention.