Supplements

Poor sleep quality (PSQI > 5) is highly prevalent in adults attending a community health center in Buenos Aires

In a cross-sectional study of 208 adults (mean age 48.3 years, 76.9% women) at a community health center, 65.4% had a PSQI score > 5, indicating poor sleep quality. Key findings included sleep latency > 15 minutes in 81.3%, daytime dysfunction in 66.3%, and sleep duration < 7 hours in 58.7%.

1 min readUpdated Jul 25, 20260 RCTsView structured evidence →
Evidence Score32/100
Human RCT☆☆☆☆☆
Meta-analysis☆☆☆☆☆
Mechanism★★★★★
Safety★★★★
Confidencelow

This article is automatically generated from the structured evidence profile behind the claim above. Scores reflect the quality and quantity of available research, not clinical advice.

Poor sleep quality (PSQI > 5) is highly prevalent in adults attending a community health center in Buenos Aires The current body of evidence comprises 1 study. EvidenceHub rates the overall confidence at 32/100 (low).

The Claim

Poor sleep quality (PSQI > 5) is highly prevalent in adults attending a community health center in Buenos Aires

This conclusion is most relevant to: Adults aged 18 years or older attending Health and Community Action Center No. 27 in Buenos Aires, Argentina (n=208, mean age 48.3 ± 14.6 years, 76.9% women).

What the Research Shows

The conclusion draws on 1 linked study. Highlights from the cited literature:

  • [Sleep disorders in adults treated at Health and Community Action Center No. 27, Buenos Aires, Argentina]. (Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina), 2026) —

How It Works

The proposed biological pathway:

  • Poor sleep quality is common in the general population
  • PSQI > 5 indicates clinically significant sleep problems
  • High prevalence observed in this community sample
  • Routine screening and sleep hygiene education are recommended

Who Might Benefit

Evidence fit by population:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older attending Health and Community Action Center No. 27 in Buenos Aires, Argentina (n=208, mean age 48.3 ± 14.6 years, 76.9% women)

Limitations & Caveats

Important context when interpreting this evidence:

  • Cross-sectional design prevents causal inference
  • Convenience sampling from a single center limits generalizability
  • Self-reported sleep measures may be subject to recall bias

Frequently Asked Questions

What percentage of participants had poor sleep quality?

65.4% of the 208 participants had a PSQI score greater than 5, indicating poor sleep quality.

What was the average sleep duration in this study?

Participants slept an average of 6.3 ± 1.5 hours per night.

How many participants reported using hypnotics?

27.4% of participants (57 out of 208) reported using hypnotic medications.

What sleep component was most commonly affected?

Sleep latency > 15 minutes was the most common issue, affecting 81.3% of participants.

References

  1. 1.Wydler C, Fraga C, Azc&#xe1;rate A, Sarcona E. “[Sleep disorders in adults treated at Health and Community Action Center No. 27, Buenos Aires, Argentina]..” Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina), 2026. PMID: 42446311 DOI: 10.53680/vertex.v37i172.1014
Disclaimer: This article is auto-generated from structured research data for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Evidence scores reflect the quality and quantity of available research, not clinical recommendations. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement or intervention.