Supplements

The Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale (GSES) shows good overall internal consistency with a pooled Cronbach's alpha of 0.81

A reliability generalization meta-analysis of 34 articles (40 independent estimates, total N=16,022) found that the GSES has good internal consistency (pooled alpha = 0.81, 95% CI [0.79, 0.82]). Significant heterogeneity was observed (I2 ≈ 85%), and publication year moderated internal consistency estimates. Reliability induction (e.g., omitting reliability coefficients) was common in nearly 58% of initially retrieved studies.

1 min readUpdated Aug 12, 20260 RCTs1 Meta-analysesView structured evidence →
Evidence Score49/100
Human RCT☆☆☆☆☆
Meta-analysis★★★☆☆
Mechanism★★★★★
Safety★★★★
Confidencelow

This article is automatically generated from the structured evidence profile behind the claim above. Scores reflect the quality and quantity of available research, not clinical advice.

The Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale (GSES) shows good overall internal consistency with a pooled Cronbach's alpha of 0.81 The current body of evidence comprises 1 study and 1 meta-analysis. EvidenceHub rates the overall confidence at 49/100 (low).

The Claim

The Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale (GSES) shows good overall internal consistency with a pooled Cronbach's alpha of 0.81

This conclusion is most relevant to: General and clinical samples from 34 studies (total N=16,022) that used the GSES.

What the Research Shows

The conclusion draws on 1 linked study. Highlights from the cited literature:

  • The Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale: A reliability generalization meta-analysis of internal consistency. (Sleep medicine, 2026) —

How It Works

The proposed biological pathway:

  • GSES items assess conscious sleep effort
  • Reliability generalization meta-analysis aggregates alpha coefficients across studies
  • Random-effects model with restricted maximum likelihood estimation
  • Pooled alpha indicates good internal consistency

Who Might Benefit

Evidence fit by population:

  • General and clinical samples from 34 studies (total N=16,022) that used the GSES

Limitations & Caveats

Important context when interpreting this evidence:

  • High heterogeneity (I2 ≈ 85%) suggests variability in reliability estimates across studies
  • Only studies reporting Cronbach's alpha were included, potentially excluding those with other reliability measures
  • Publication year was the only significant moderator; other factors (language, age, sex, sample type, design, quality) did not explain heterogeneity

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale (GSES)?

The GSES is a questionnaire that measures the extent to which individuals consciously try to control their sleep, often used in insomnia research.

What is the overall internal consistency of the GSES?

The pooled Cronbach's alpha is 0.81 (95% CI [0.79, 0.82]), indicating good internal consistency.

Does the reliability of the GSES vary across studies?

Yes, there is significant heterogeneity (I2 ≈ 85%), and only publication year was a significant moderator; other sample characteristics did not explain the variability.

What is reliability induction in this context?

Reliability induction refers to citing previously reported reliability coefficients instead of reporting sample-specific ones; it was observed in nearly 58% of initially retrieved studies.

References

  1. 1.Gaspar V, Dias SF, Broomfield NM, Espie CA, Marques DR. “The Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale: A reliability generalization meta-analysis of internal consistency..” Sleep medicine, 2026. PMID: 42570354 DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2026.109182
Disclaimer: This article is auto-generated from structured research data for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Evidence scores reflect the quality and quantity of available research, not clinical recommendations. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement or intervention.