Supplements

REM-predominant OSA is associated with lower spontaneous resolution rates in children managed with watchful waiting, but adenotonsillectomy yields similar resolution rates regardless of OSA subtype.

In a secondary analysis of the Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial, children with REM-predominant OSA (REM-AHI/NREM-AHI ≥2) had lower odds of spontaneous resolution at 7 months under watchful waiting compared to non-REM-predominant OSA (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.97). However, adenotonsillectomy resulted in similar resolution rates between the two groups (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.34-1.66). REM-predominant OSA was also associated with greater daytime sleepiness and PSG severity but not with worse parent-reported symptom burden or quality of life.

Last updated: Aug 5, 20261 RCTs📖 Read as article →

Evidence Score

Evidence Score44/100
Human RCT★★☆☆☆
Meta-analysis☆☆☆☆☆
Mechanism★★★★★
Safety★★★★
Confidencelow

Study Evidence

Study 1. Risk Factors, Symptom Burden, and Treatment Response in Pediatric REM-Predominant OSA: Evidence From the Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial.

observational

Wang C, Wang A, Wu J, Wang Y · Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology (2026)

Participants: N/A
Duration: 7 months
Intervention: Adenotonsillectomy (AT) versus watchful waiting
Outcome: OSA resolution at 7-month follow-up, daytime sleepiness, AHI, oxygen saturation nadir, PSQ symptom burden, OSA-18 quality of life
Effect Size: aOR for spontaneous resolution in REM-predominant vs non-REM-predominant under watchful waiting = 0.52 (95% CI 0.28-0.97); aOR for resolution after AT = 0.75 (95% CI 0.34-1.66)
Population: Children aged 5.0-9.9 years with OSA from the Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial (n=382, 48.2% male, median age 6.75 years)

Result:

Mechanism Graph

REM-predominant OSA is defined by a REM-AHI to NREM-AHI ratio ≥2
This subtype is associated with greater daytime sleepiness and PSG severity (higher AHI, lower oxygen nadir)
Under watchful waiting, spontaneous resolution is less likely in REM-predominant OSA
Adenotonsillectomy appears to overcome this difference, leading to similar resolution rates

Limitations

  • Secondary analysis of a randomized trial, not a pre-specified subgroup analysis
  • Definition of REM-predominant OSA (ratio ≥2) may not be universally accepted
  • Follow-up limited to 7 months, long-term outcomes not assessed
  • Parent-reported symptom burden and quality of life may not capture all clinically relevant differences

Frequently Asked Questions

What is REM-predominant OSA?

REM-predominant OSA is a subtype of obstructive sleep apnea where apneas and hypopneas occur predominantly during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, defined here as a REM-AHI to NREM-AHI ratio of ≥2.

Does adenotonsillectomy work as well for REM-predominant OSA as for non-REM-predominant OSA?

Yes, the study found no significant difference in OSA resolution rates at 7 months between children with REM-predominant and non-REM-predominant OSA after adenotonsillectomy (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.34-1.66).

Are children with REM-predominant OSA more likely to have symptoms?

They have greater daytime sleepiness and more severe PSG measures (higher AHI, lower oxygen nadir), but parent-reported symptom burden (PSQ) and quality of life (OSA-18) were not significantly different from non-REM-predominant OSA.

Should children with REM-predominant OSA be treated differently?

The findings suggest that watchful waiting is less likely to lead to spontaneous resolution in REM-predominant OSA, so adenotonsillectomy may be prioritized for these children.

Products

Affiliate links coming soon. We only recommend products that match the doses and forms used in the cited research.

References

  1. 1.Wang C, Wang A, Wu J, Wang Y. "Risk Factors, Symptom Burden, and Treatment Response in Pediatric REM-Predominant OSA: Evidence From the Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial.." Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. PMID: 42544299 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.70524
Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Evidence scores reflect the quality and quantity of available research, not clinical recommendations. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement or intervention.